Home Page Subscribe Unsubscribe Advertising Comments About ITVT Features Industry Jobs ScreenShot Gallery Relevant Books Company Profiles Events Research & Papers Glossary Writers Contact Us |
![]() ![]() Feature: Contributed Opinion"The Changing Face of Privacy"Issue 3.91 10/3/01 by Doug Peckover for [itvt] Just after the terrorist attack, former President George Bush Sr. said: "We've got to prepare to give up our civil liberties" (Reuters). In June, Bob Barr (Rep. R-Georgia) blasted the FBI's veil of secrecy over Carnivore, a system to read email. The day after the terrorist attacks Barr said: "We must give our government every tool" to combat terrorists (CNET). A New York Times article (9/18/01) describes technology with "almost limitless possibilities, including national electronic identification cards...[that] could be coordinated with fingerprints or, in a few years, facial characteristics, and be programmed to permit or limit access through turnstiles to buildings or areas. They could track someone's location, financial transactions, criminal history and even driving speed on a particular highway on a given night." The balance between privacy and national security will be a major debate in the coming weeks and months. Just two weeks ago, privacy was called "a major obstacle" to ITV (Wired) and no one knows how consumers might react to any changes in civil liberties. Having less privacy to benefit national security is one matter - having less privacy to benefit ITV companies is an entirely different matter. Tracking what a person watches on TV and then selling it to advertisers could supplement ITV subscription fee revenues, but at what risk? In its 2000 Annual Report, TiVo wrote: "Consumers may be concerned about the use of personal information gathered by the TiVo Service... Privacy concerns, however, could create uncertainty in the marketplace for personal television and our products and services. Changes in our privacy policy could reduce demand for the TiVo Service, increase the cost of doing business as a result of litigation costs or increased service delivery costs, or otherwise harm our reputation and business." When this report was written, Americans ranked the loss of personal privacy as their number one concern about the 21st Century (Wall Street Journal). A possible solution to the balance between subscriber privacy and ITV profits can be found in the activities of a progressive retailer in Europe, which sells everything from food to luxury items. This retailer offers a special service that is specifically designed for people who do want privacy. This retailer has designed a unique service where people describe what they want to a personal shopper. The shopper then goes to the store and makes the purchases without revealing the customer's identity. This solution is significant because (1) "know thy customer" has been replaced by "know thy customer's needs"; (2) the "unfulfilled demand" data is estimated by a top U.S. marketing strategist to be 600% more valuable than traditional demographic or profile data because the guesswork of what someone wants has been completely eliminated; (3) this service attracts a type of customer that has a higher than average income and is prepared to pay a premium for products; (4) advertising costs are low (zero in this case), and (5) customer loyalty is high. This strategy could work for savvy ITV firms that want to acquire and retain higher-value customers, increase loyalty, improve promotional yields, obtain better marketing data (unfulfilled demand), and gain a competitive advantage over other companies.
Here's how this service could work for firms like TiVo:
Doug Peckover is a strategic privacy consultant. He can be reached at doug@yourcommand.com
|